Realize, we are talking about the human mind—actually changing the foundational building blocks of everything in the universe.
The BBC’s bbc.com published a February 16, 2017 article by Philip Ball, entitled “The Strange Link Between the Human Mind and Quantum Physics,” discussing ongoing debates on the value of using quantum physics as a vehicle to understand human consciousness—providing arguments from both/several sides. [1]
One might consider particles going through the slit—behaving in an orderly fashion ‘when being watched,’ while becoming unruly in their weird quantum behavior when ‘not being watched’—paints a rather comical image of these building blocks of reality being not unlike playful school children. When the teacher/observer leaves the room, things get wild, when the teacher enters the room butts become seated, backs become straight, and eyes fix forward.
Although Quantum Physics’ founders largely felt “observation” was the factor. Later, mechanistic physicists insisted it was not an “observation vs. non-observation” phenomenon, but rather a “study procedural” issue—clouding the issue of this profound effect of consciousness/observation affecting the wave/particle function. That is until Dr. Dean Radin of the Institute of Noetic Sciences (author of: Entangled Minds: Extrasensory Experiences in a Quantum Reality, The Noetic Universe, and The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena) conducted a very large multi-year experiment involving at first people sitting within two meters of the laser shooting particles through the slits, engaged in alternating periods of ‘focusing” and “not focusing”’ on a mental image of particles passing through the slits.’
The study involved people who were non-meditators, as well as people who practiced meditation regularly. Radin said subjects were asked to “keep the double slit in mind, and to imagine in their mind’s eye if they could see which of the two slits the proton went through … the only way of directly testing if consciousness could collapse the wave function.” Dr. Radin explained, “The meditators observed the double-slit in their mind for 30 seconds, and were told to rest for 30 seconds, then repeated that sequence 40 times in a typical session [137 people participated in 250 sessions]. In 4 pilot studies the meditators did quite well. A follow up study found a similar result, producing a “4.5 Sigma” result [Same as a Z score in this case. Sigma in physics equals standard error or standard normal deviate. In statistics for psychology and the social sciences ‘Z score’ is the term)]. The 4.5 Sigma score effect was when people were “observing,” but when no one was observing the results were almost exactly “chance” results.Dr. Radin pointed out, “Keep in mind that a 5 Sigma result was able to give CERN the Nobel Prize for finding the Higgs particle …so we were suspicious of [our results] because they seemed way too good.”
Radin said they did another 50 sessions in a second formal experiment, again getting a positive result.Suspicious that the physical proximity of the human body [of the meditators affecting the wave function via directed thought] might affect the results, they expanded the study to include people “observing the particle/slit in their minds eye, via the internet.” For 3 years involving 2,089 sessions by 689 people around the world, some results approached 5 Sigma. See footnote video link for graphs, entitled: “New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter ~ Dean Radin, Ph.D.”[2]). They found the “Observer effect was independent of distance,” meaning that results were virtually the same regardless of the distance observers were away from the lab around the world. The researchers followed up these finding with 2 years of study to see if results could be replicated, involving 2,985 session with 1,479 people. When all the results were combined in a meta-analysis, the result was between approximately 4 to 8 Sigma effects.
Again, 5 Sigma got CERN the Nobel Prize, although the CERN experiment Sigma was from a single massive experiment, whereas IONS Sigma results were based on a series of overall results from a series of independent tests, Dr. Radin explained). Upon my contacting Dr. Radin to make certain I understood the data correctly, he gave me links to updated articles (see below), explaining that ‘some of their best even more conservative study’s later analysis achieved about z = 4.4, not quite 5.0. ‘ However, “z =4.4” means in statistical odds terms that there was only a “1 in 180,000” chance that their scores could have been only pure random chance.
By now, given the above examples of unfounded spurious attacks on phenomena/data/research of paradigm shifting science eventually fully accepted by science—inevitably, this too was given a seemingly half-hearted attempt to dismiss these findings, which simply ignored data supporting Dr. Radin’s research, as well as ignoring other independent research which also validated the consciousness/particle behavior findings. For nerds like me, you may enjoy the link to a response article in-footnotes “Commentary: False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol,” April 1, 2020, by Arnaud Delorme, Dean Radin, Helané Wahbeh [See Dr. Arnaud Delome and Dr. Helané Wahbeh’s distinguished bios in footnote below the article link. [3].]
As I mentioned above, Dr. Radin has published several update articles [see footnotes links to all of them [4]]. Dr. Radin summarizes, “To date, starting in 1998, some 28 experiments based on this idea have been reported by four labs using different protocols, optical apparatus, gas and diode lasers, single-photon designs, and analytical approaches. Of these tests, 11 were reportedly statistically significant at p<0.05 (two-tail), where just 1 would be expected by chance. The binomial cumulative probability of the published results so far is p < 0.0000001.” To recap for clarity, out of 28 studies—11 were statistically significant—and for results to have “happened by chance” there could not have been more than “only 1 or none” of the studies being statistically significant. In probability terms, this score is really beyond doubt that Meditators minds affected physical matter. It is worth noting that virtually all of the original founders of quantum physics—legends in the field, knew that consciousness affected the particle/wave function.
Physicists, who argue against it, are arguing with the giants of their field—as well as the data you see here. [1] Ball, Philip; The Strange Link Between the Human Mind and Quantum Physics; bbc.com, February 16, 2017, http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20170215-the-strange-link-between-the-human-mind-and-quantum-physics
[2] New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter ~ Dean Radin, PhD, IONS (Institute of Noetic Sciences), June 17, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRSBaq3vAeY
[3] Commentary: False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol, April 1, 2020, Dr.s Arnaud Delorme, Dean Radin, Helané Wahbeh, https://noetic.org/publication/commentary-false-positive-effect-in-the-radin-double-slit-experiment-on-observer-consciousness-as-determined-with-the-advanced-meta-experimental-protocol/ [BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS of “Commentary: False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined With the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol,” supporting Dr. Radin’s wave/particle/consciousness studies: Dr. Arnaud Delorme: Arnaud Delorme, Ph.D., is a CNRS principal investigator in Toulouse, France, a member faculty at the University of California, San Diego, and a Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences. Postdoctorate at the Salk Institute, focusing on statistical analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals recorded during various cognitive tasks. He developed the free EEGLAB software for advanced analysis of EEG signals in collaboration with Scott Makeig, software which is now amongst the most used in EEG research worldwide. He was awarded a Brettencourt-Schueller young investigator award and a 10-year anniversary ANT young investigator award for his contributions to the field of EEG research. Dr. Helané Wahbeh: Dr. Wahbeh is the Director of Research at the Institute of Noetic Sciences and an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Neurology at Oregon Health & Science University. Dr. Wahbeh is clinically trained as a naturopathic physician and research trained with a Master of Clinical Research and two post-doctoral research fellowships. She has published on and spoken internationally about her studies on complementary and alternative medicine, mind-body medicine, stress, and posttraumatic stress disorder and their relationships to physiology, health and healing. Her VET-MIND study funded by the National Institutes of Health examined the mechanisms of meditation for combat veterans with PTSD.]
[4]
Radin, D., Wahbeh, H., Michel, L. Delorme, A. (2021). Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern: Exploratory evidence of a causal influence, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350862574_Psychophysical_interactions_with_a_double-slit_interference_pattern_Exploratory_evidence_of_a_causal_influence
Radin D, Wahbeh H, Michel L and Delorme A (2020) Commentary: False-Positive Effect in the Radin Double-Slit Experiment on Observer Consciousness as Determined with the Advanced Meta-Experimental Protocol. https://noetic.org/publication/commentary-false-positive-effect-in-the-radin-double-slit-experiment-on-observer-consciousness-as-determined-with-the-advanced-meta-experimental-protocol/
Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays.https://noetic.org/publication/psychophysical-modulation-of-fringe-visibility-in-a-distant-double-slit-optical-system/
Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2015). Reassessment of an independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern. Physics Essays. https://noetic.org/publication/reassessment-of-an-independent-verification-of-psychophysical-interactions-with-a-double-slit-interference-pattern/
Radin, D. Michel, L., Pierce, A. Delorme, A. (2015). Psychophysical interactions with a single-photon double-slit optical system. https://noetic.org/publication/psychophysical-interactions-with-a-single-photon-double-slit-optical-system/Radin, D. I., Delorme, A.., Michel, L., Johnston, J. (2013). https://noetic.org/publication/psychophysical-interactions-with-a-double-slit-interference-pattern/
Radin, D. I., Michel, L, Wendland, P., Rickenbach, R., Delorme, A., Galdamez, K. (2012). Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments. https://noetic.org/publication/consciousness-and-the-double-slit-interference-pattern-six-experiments/